Dr. V. Prieb
The concept of the dual-energetic martensite form (CODEM)
for the background of divers phenomena in shape memory alloys
by V. Prieb
The review of my intimate and creative life
with shape memory alloys during the last 45 years (1974-2019) and
the saying goodbye to them. It is now time to renounce on that
and to move on to my new muses Erato and Melpomene. May 2019
The concept of the dual-energetic martensite form (CODEM) is presented, based on the experimentally proven fact that the martensitic transformations and
associated phenomena in SMAs be determined not only by the generally defined and assumed polydomain form of martensite, resulting from the 1st accommodation mechanism,
but also real and essential by its monodomain form without substructure.
A martensite polydomain has higher free energy than that of a martensite monodomain due to contribution of stacking fault energy . The whole energetic spectrum of martensite states between the both martensite forms is determined by the stacking fault density .
The equilibrium temperature of austenite and martensite monodomain is much higher than that of austenite and martensite polydomain. The first one is a fundamental quantity
determined only by the SMA composition, while the second one is very variable and can be influenced by several metallurgical factors.
The austenite is metastable in the temperature range between the both equilibrium temperatures. This metastable state is characterized by well-known
premartensitic phenomena such as softening of the elasticity modulus, formation of fluctuative intermediate shear structures, superelasticity along the
Clausius-Clapeyron equilibrium line.
The CODEM considers different effects of the elastic energy of AM-phase boundaries and of internal MM-martensite boundaries on the free energy of the two-phase system:
the first contribution equally increases the free energies of austenite and martensite and thus of the whole system without affecting the two-phase equilibrium, the second
one only increases the free energy of the martensite and thus changes the two-phase equilibrium.
The energy increasing of the whole two-phase system causes the need for continuous supercooling to drive the forward martensitic transformation
(athermic transformation kinetics in the thermoelasticity model). The energy increasing of only the martensite due to the coalescence of martensite variants
(2nd accommodation mechanism) leads to a decreasing of the equilibrium temperature during the transformation.
The decreasing of stacking fault density in the martensite phase by the ferroelastic deformation cycles or in individual martensite crystals by changing the stress field
in their environment, consiedered in the CODEM as martensite monodomainization, causes true stabilization of the martensite in sense of increasing its reverse
transformation temperature in the temperature range beetween the both equilibrium temperatures. This explains RPM (return point memory) effects in partial cycles of
ferroelastic deformation and thermo-induced reverse transformation (also known as SMART- effect or TAME).
The martensite monodomainization leads to the degradation of the memory properties of SMA-actuators after several working cycles.
The stabilization by the plastic deformation at that does not take place. The blocking of martensite boundaries by dislocations occurs only through
plastic deformation of the martensite. These two stabilization mechanisms can be clearly recognized by aging at different temperatures.
Many experimental results obtained so far at the SMAs were no longer justifiable by the thermoelasticity model and some even directly contradict its main postulates.
The CODEM provides comprehensive and plausible explanations for most of the phenomena known in SMAs.
More about this in my monograph, published in November 2020:
"The concept of dual-energetic martensite (CODEM) for shape memory phenomena", PDF-file